Confessions of a content farm writer


Hi. My name is Christine, and I write for a content farm.

It started back in 2008. At first, I didn’t tell many people about it. I would deny it, or talk poorly about it to others if the subject came up. I kept the secret, because when you feel like you’re whoring out your writing abilities, it screws with your confidence.

In the beginning, I did it for fun, because the extra cash was nice. Those articles paid for many Christmas and birthday presents, and lots of shoes. For those reasons, I didn’t mind writing about topics I had no interest in, like ball bearings or the art of differentiating Range Rover models.

Then, we put our son in daycare, and essentially had to come up with another rent payment each month. That’s when writing for a content farm got added to the list of stuff I’m truly thankful for.

I’ve read numerous articles about the content farm backlash. As a content farm writer, one might assume I don’t like what Google is doing. But frankly, I don’t mind. Nor do I regret the work I’ve done (finally). Here’s why:

1. I need the income, so 99.9 percent of the time, I write for flat fees instead of revenue shares. As I’m sure many other content farm writers can attest, I’m currently not in a position to write revenue share articles and hope people get click-happy.  So, I choose the more secure revenue stream, because it’s not worth it to me to write revenue share articles on topics I don’t love. For example, I’m intensely interested in social media, so I wrote a revenue share article about social media strategy, based on my own thought process and research I actually wanted to do. I don’t care if the article never makes a dime, because I had fun writing it, and learned a thing or two in the process.

2. It’s only fair that bad articles go to the bottom of the pile. Content farms probably make much more SEO revenue on my articles than the flat fees I accepted. So, this is one instance where you should get what you pay for. If the article is crap, it shouldn’t get found so easily. But if content farms paid a fair price, their content quality would likely go through the roof and deserve top spots on Google search lists. And who knows? They might make even more money. 

 3. It’s actually kind of fun trying to butter the stale, dry pieces of toast that are some of these article topics. Come on, do you know anyone who actually wants to read about french stunt kites, or Toyota Previa repairs? But a writer who can weave a beautiful web of words about trailer siding deserves to be proud, not to mention read. Good writing is good writing, no matter the topic.

4. I get to write at home instead of working somewhere else. I accept the fact that some of the stuff I’ve written for content farms is total crap. More articles still might have been decent if not for the SEO ringer. But when I put it into perspective, I’m still writing. And for this, I am proud. There are so many worse things I could be doing for less pay that would require me to spend time away from my family. So as I work to better the situation, I will play with my son, and then stay up late to work instead of working somewhere else and not getting to spend time with my son at all.

I must note that I’m not looking for sympathy. I felt the need to share my perspective plainly and honestly, because I’m tired of people bashing content farms and their writers when they don’t know the stories behind the stories. So until the situation changes — whether that means making the same money in fewer articles and hours, or being privileged enough to be paid handsomely to write what I love — I will continue to do my best. No matter the topic, no matter the Google search ranking.

Tags: , , , ,

About christinegeraci

Working for Capital Region BOCES and blogging for Digital Pivot. Mom. Wife. Journalist. Political junkie. Formidable cook. Solid addition to any music trivia team.

5 Responses to “Confessions of a content farm writer”

  1. Matthew D. Holden says :

    Sing it sister! I for one don’t like what Google is doing. Not to sound too Glen Beck-ish here, but it worries me that Google has the amount of control they do. It is getting to the point that they can determine what is news and what isn’t, and that concerns me. I don’t pretend to be smart enough to know what they should do, how to create the unbiased search engine. It can’t be based solely on views because when I want to look up information on Italian culture I don’t want the first site on the list to be a link to Snookie’s book, but there is going to come a time, I think, when there are going to have to be regulations for what a search engine can and cannot do, because there is the possibility of a kind of media monopoly here. Sooooo… yeah. That really isn’t about what you wrote, but you mentioned it in the beginning and got me going.

    • christinegeraci says :

      I definitely see your point Matt. The power of Google, Facebook, et. al., is amazing and kind of frightening at the same time. I actually have this idea for a novel that’s based on what you’re talking about. Maybe someday I’ll get to write it when I’m not hijacking Google searches with SEO-laden copy in my spare time. ;)

  2. Mike says :

    I’m way late to the response party on this one, so apologies for that. But is it really the government’s place to decide what a search engine can or should filter or to determine what a “proper” filter is. I hate to get Glenn Beck on this, but I’d much rather trust Google to do that than a Congress that changes party majority every two years largely based on fear no matter who wins.

    • christinegeraci says :

      Hi Mike! I wasn’t aware that Google’s decision to alter its search algorithms was the result of government prodding. I found an article that suggested the EU had something to do with it, but that’s about it. Do you have a link you can share?

      Regardless, I do agree with you to a certain extent, but I also think this is a slippery slope. It’s natural for individuals, businesses, etc. to want to get noticed and get ahead on the web, and therefore invest money and/or time into SEO so their links have better chances of getting clicked and thus making them money, regardless of whether or not the links contain high-quality content, or even relevance. One would hope that most people can separate the whipped cream from the bullcrap anyway, so people should indeed have the right to compete fairly for attention on the world wide web.

      But if spammers and money-mongers clog up the top search spots with crap you’re not looking for, it takes more time to get to the good stuff, which is annoying and inefficient for the end user. So in that respect, I would hope Google would regulate this behavior, so I can access my free, high-quality content without having to scroll through page after page of drivel. But they’re also a for-profit company. Some sort of watchdog entity should probably make sure they’re doing the right thing. Whether or not that should be the government, I don’t know.

  3. Adel says :

    You write well sweetheart. Best to you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 291 other followers